Selixa vs Claude

Claude gives you an answer.Selixa does the job.

Claude is built to help anyone with anything. Selixa is built for your team's work, and does it the way an expert would.

Same ask, two results

Review PR #482 for security.

Claude

Things to check in a security review:

  1. 1. Validate every input
  2. 2. Check authentication
  3. 3. Never commit secrets
  4. 4. Keep dependencies updated

Illustration

Claude gives you a list of tips.

Advice that could fit any company. You still work out the steps and do the job.

SelixaSecurity review of a change

  • Read the change and what it touches
  • Check auth, secrets and input handling
  • List risks by severity, with the fix
  • Ask first, then comment on the PR

A clear risk list on the pull request, posted once you approve.

Illustration

Selixa does the job.

It follows the “Security review of a change” playbook in your tools, step by step, and asks before it changes anything.

The difference

Built to answer anything.
Built for the job.

Claude

  • Built to help anyone with anything
  • You work out the steps and the prompt
  • Answers that could fit any company
  • You build and maintain your own agents

Selixa

  • Built for the jobs your team does
  • Follows the steps an expert takes, every time
  • Works from your tools, meetings and decisions
  • Playbooks ready on day one, from people who do the job

Use both.
Each for its job.

Keep Claude for

Long documents and contractsWriting in your voiceCoding with Claude CodeQuick prototypes as artifacts

Bring in Selixa for

Security review of a change · SecurityShip a small fix · EngineeringTriage dependency alerts · SecurityPRD from a thread · Product+ Your own playbooks
See every playbook

Hire your next AI teammate with industry experience.